The Existence and Survival of Cities versus IT Movement

Earnest Burgess (1925), Chauncy Harris, Edward Ullman and Mekenzie (1945) and Homer Hoyt (1939 are few theorist that are universally reckoned with as regarding the analysis of cities, its structure and growth. However, due to the low level of development then, technology wise and beyond, the present day heavy impact of the IT revolution wasn’t inculcated in their analysis and envisagement.  Albeit a few sociologist and environmental academics have made attempt in weighing the effect of the IT movement  as compared with the existence and survival of cities and the reasons that birthed them.

Cities as seen from its evolution over years evolved from means to meet the need people in general. In prospect of meeting needs, quite a number of ideas, strategies, introduction, and services and so on came into existence. However, the cities are noted with characteristics like large number of people, heavy transportation system, high employment opportunities, education, congestion and influx of people, institution and secretariats, industries, trading centres, exhibition centres and so on because of all of the these evolve around meeting man’s need which also gave way for specialisation to come and stay as also an attribute or cities.

Traditionally or historically, the emergence of cities is a process which gradually grew out of geographical nodes where people strive to meet all their needs with what they have and from where they resided. The immediate geographical units where cities actually often evolved from were, to major extent, favoured by the natural attributes of such geographical location. These natural factors may include rivers, climatic conditions, topography, natural resources, and physical features like rocks forest etcetera located around such areas. The natural endowments of nature gave the then dwellers something to start/ live with and in constant quest of meeting all their needs, they engaged their brain in more constrictive thoughts. The advent of development of European, American, and the British countries as regard trading, production, transportation culminated into the development of most today developing countries.

Trading is or can be seen as a major factor in processes of city emergence right from rigid and Stone Age trade by barter method to the present computerised system of the 21st Century. In response to  meeting up with the demands of trade in the light  of fairness, flexibility, transparency, ease of transaction, fastness , equality, trade records and what-a-view; these reasons have being huge contributors in the development of the present city environment.

The advent of these major authorities had quite a significant change to developing nation thoughts and the way things were done. Hence, more diverse and specialised ways of meeting a man needs came into play and the farm/ nomadic way, commercial, industrial, transport, computerised/ information Technology (IT) age integrated into one another.

The fusion of all of these development gave rise to the cities we have today, though still of different sizes. It is important to say different geographical units then (now present cities) had different natural endowments at different proportion and which can be said to be accountable for the difference in the rate, size, pattern, prospect etcetera of city development but the transportation development came into bridge substantial gap among these difference in the spatial distribution of cities and sustained the city as we have it today.

Meeting needs is the striking platform of which cities is said to be created and transportation was prominent mean through which goods and services are conveyed to the end users to meet his needs. It is established fact that everybody has a need he wants to react out for or to but transportation solely had been their means of reaching their needs because of the then technology level until the introduction of phones, internet in this later era. It is obvious or deducible that on a one on one basis, this can be seen as threat posed to transportation and its validity or level of its relevance over the years and the years to come. Hence the IT age came in and affected, to a wide-spread extent, the two major activities that keep man in touch with his needs i.e. production and transportation. The objective of a product and services is to meet up with end user’s need(s). But then, the way it reaches and works for each person is also quite important and this is a factor the present technology has come to work with.

Personally, the IT system is more of an abstract/ intangible system and its continuous operation is leaning towards converting or modifying as much physical or ‘real’ (face-to-face) things or service rendering system that exists to ‘unreal’ or intangible system as expressed in the digital or graphics and electronic ways and experienced in the e-transaction vices, emails, and phones, online videos, and channels advanced computerised programmes and so on. Hence man doesn’t need to physically in touch with the ‘reals’ to acknowledge what he wants or be present in person in his services unit to perform. Instead, he even access and know what he wants to know or be present in person in his service unit to perform. Instead, he can even access and know what he wants to know with the present level of graphics computerisation like 3dimensional and 4 dimensional screen projections, advanced simulation system, holographic projections and so on. More so, the internet has made it easier to send thing across the world against the rigid post mail system which involves moving (transportation) from one place to the other.

Hence, the need to stay in the city in an attempt to be in proximity to man’s need has now been augmented as people can now stay at different part of the country or world and still perform their activities, through the internet services.

Therefore, with the present day technology, one can say that computing will reduce commuting, as everyone starts to work at home or at their local neighbourhood cybercafé, thus setting setting foot in a car for office resumption purposes again. Robert Fishman, in his book, Bourgeois Utopias, goes so far as to say that information technology has ‘completely superseded the face to face contact of the transitional city’, thus rendering such contact obsolete. This means, however, not just that car use would in theory is reduced, but that employees would be able to live further and further afield, a green field.  But is such contact ‘obsolete?  In his book Edge city, Joel Garreau Observes: Humans sill put an over whelming premium on face to face contact. Telephones, fax machines, electronic mail, and video-conferencing all share a problem; they do not produce intense relationship a market thrives for bringing people together physically.

In corollary, in as much as the IT has a given some tangible economy reasons for people who live far away yet get their work done but not all  activities/ involvement in production and serviced rendering can be channelled through this IT vices. What happens if one needs to visit a relaxation park or stadium or concert? Thus there yet to tackled social reasons why cities will surely survive and exist. Man is in fact first social before economical. The ‘Live’ effect of human meeting one another can’t is not that one can easily put a price tag on and relatively cannot be compromised.


Moreover, those declaring the death of the city must re-examine the assumptions upon which they pass sentence. Saskia Sassen, Dutch-American sociologist , has demonstrated in her challenging studies; mass developments in the telecommunications and ascendance of information industries have led analyst and politicians to proclaim that place(particularly the type of place represented by cities) no longer matters. These trends represent only half of what is happening. Alongside the well document spatial dispersal of economic activities, new forms of territorial centralisation of top level management and control operations have appeared. National and global markets require places where the work of globalisation gets done. The ‘places’ according to Sassen’s research are often the old cities others have dismissed as obsolete.  Her view, which takes into account the material base of information technology’s dematerialised  product, is a necessary  counterbalance to the fashionable orthodoxy of total ephemerality , and present economic reasons for concentration, rather than the usual social ones ( The desire for face-to-face contact and for urban culture). She further said ‘Those within environmentalism hoping that information technology will cause our troublesome cities to wither away seem to be hoping in vain’.

 In conclusion, cities would continue to exist because it was built on a platform of meeting needs which is ultimately an undying reason for its existence. IT evolved in from attempts to meet human needs which also described part of the city objectives. It can only be said that the pattern of city growth will be metamorphosized or shirked to fit into the present characteristics and demands of the city- perhaps, the birth of ‘hi-tech cities’.

Thank you



The Epistles of Disequilibrium Property Investment and Affordability -Developed Nations Vs Developing Countries (Nigeria)

‘A nation of homeowners is unconquerable – Franklin D. Roosevelt’

 ‘A poor man cannot own a house in Nigeria’- a professor in Nigeria jokingly said

Land is almost of an indispensible good whether economically, socially, politically, emotionally and so on. The thirst to have land or landed property is almost completely unquenchable by most individuals as those who have it want to have more and those who don’t want to have. Housing has become a regular feature in economic, social and political debates often with highly charged emotional contents (Agbola, 1998)

Different Property professionals and academics have preached about the positive impact property in diverse dimensions. The need and provision of sufficient housing in any country is very vital as housing is a catalyst of the national economy. Property and property investment plays a significant role in the wider economy. Property is a factor of production, it is also a corporate asset and it is also an investment medium. Housing is a set of lasting assets, which accounts for a chunk of a country’s wealth and on which households spend a substantial part of their income. The impact of a good percentage (say 70) of the citizens of a country owning land is that of immense positive contribution to its economy and its standard of living. As a factor of production, property provides the space in which economic activity and production takes place..

Unfortunately, evident and inherent enough, the concept of land ownership has taken an awkward and chaotic turn especially in most developing countries like ours. The reason behind the need and the need to own land has sky-rocketed albeit the actual owning of it or investment in it in most developing nation’s almost nothing to write home about.

In developing countries like ours, quite a number of reasons have been alleged or made accountable for the poor ownership of land by its citizens. Housing problems are exacerbated by the combination of many factors. In Nigeria, like in many other developing nations of the world housing problems are multi dimensional. Chukwujekwu (2006) was referenced in Business Management Dynamics Journal of 2011 on ‘Issues and Challenges Militating against the Sustainability of Affordable Housing Provision in Nigeria’ by Ayedun and Oluwatobi. Summarily but not limited to were twelve points, ten was which were directly anchored on cost or finance as regard the creation of housing. Thus, inferring that about 80 percent of Issues and Challenges inhabiting Sustainability of Affordable Housing Provision in Nigeria is cost/ finance. Although some other academics have seen property owning and investment in nation as arising from poor land accessibility as off-shooting from poor land titling, policies harshness and bureaucracy, the bane of the problem is finance which is in fact the reason for the elaborate lacuna between the level of adequacy in developed countries versus the paucity in developing countries.

Thus, the resultant factor of all of these cumulative encumbrances is that investment and willingness in property is that of high sensitivity and volatility as investors want to out cover the cost(financially and stress-wise ) and risk or investing in landed property. In an article dated April 27, 2013 and titled ‘Home ownership options for low income earner’ by Maureen Azuh said ‘ Even investing in estates has proved to be expensive too. Developers who are into the business acquire land and develop into plots or finished buildings. They must recover the money invested in the project.’

More so, in an American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research in 2012, Adedeji and Olotuah said that Fundamental to inadequate and un-affordable housing in the nation is the lack of access to housing finance by this segment of the society. In view of its enormous cost, housing is the item of the highest expenditure of every household and it can rarely be purchased directly from one’s earnings. Access to housing finance is thus imperative in the acquisition of housing, but this has always eluded low-income earners a great deal.

The history of the genesis property investment disequilibrium or tilting is often related to major events such as the two world wars. However, there are two economically based exceptions, the depression of the early 1930s and the oil and secondary banking crisis of the early 1970s. There was no evidence in the data collected that the depression of the early 1930s impacted on the property and its valuation process or technique but there is evidence that the two later property market downturns in the early 1970s and 1990s had an impact. The most radical change in investment in the post second world war era was an opinion rather than a real change.

Thus, after the Second World War, there was a huge shortage of properties as opposed to the surplus or adequacy it used to be. The economy law of demand and supply became full-fleshed; when demand outweighs supply, the value as reflected price (inflation) of such commodity increases and the birth of inequality in property investment or ownership was delivered to world which has spread far and wide throughout the nation of the earth.

Perhaps one is prompted to ask; how can a land issue or use in another nation spread to several other nations? The answer is this; an inherent characteristic of land is that it is relatively fixed. Thus any use land is put to in another part of the world is actually a fraction of its total relatively fixed size.

By illustration, Just like one can take a bite from and apple and the other side still looks fresh and untouched doesn’t mean it is still complete and bitten part unprone or unsusceptible to bacterial that can spread round and contaminate the rest of the apple. It is diverse tools like innovative and calculative policies and financing schemes among others that the developed countries have used and still using to strike a balance or restoration of the bitten part of the property investment market and the maintenance of it. The property market is like a being suffering from a cancerous disease in which damage if not urgently operated will lead to a lasting awful end

The rise in price, of course created a drop in those who could afford land before which translated into the gap among land owners, land borrowers and non-owners. It is the overlooking of such mere gaps or disparities, as little as it was then, that has spread to almost incurable challenge we have today in most developing countries. Unfortunately, the cue of negligence was early enough detected and worked upon by the developed countries but the blind men (developing countries) couldnt see or read the cue until it became too late and almost incurable or like to terminal disease to its citizens in the social or economic light.

The resultants of the occurrence by post Second World War first; relatively rapid introduction of rent reviews. Secondly; reduction in the time period between reviews. By the early 1970s reviews are present in most long leases which was not so in the 1960S period. The periods reduced quickly from 21 and14 years in the 1960s to periods of 7 and 5 years by the early 1970s. Unpleasant enough, the next event was the 1970s property crash. In an attempt by the conservative UK government to curb the inflation and minimize the gap between the now three class people- land owners, land borrowers and non- owners, they introduced a commercial property rent freeze with all rents frozen at their current level. This however didn’t go down too well as it created a conception for the investors, right or wrong, that the current income was more important than prospective increases at review. It has been suggested that the to-date phenomenon of upward only rent review was a product of this downturn but property market data suggests that, due to high inflation rates, rents did not fall within a standard rent review period (5-7 years at the time). So, where rents were reviewed after the downturn, they were generally reviewed upwards.

This history culminated and translated into the evolution of new valuation models or methods. This also showcased itself by the development of new degree courses in UK in the 1970s and also led to a changing authorship of the basic texts by the new academics. Crosby among others later became notable and accepted authors of some of new models.

For about 5 decades, attempt of the made to bridge this grab. For instance the ‘rent freeze’ introduction in the UK around the 1970s is an example. The Primary Mortgage Instruction (PMI) and Secondary Mortgage Institution (SMI) in the US is another example. More Securitization by most nations is also an effort in-tune to this. However little has been done in developing countries to bridge such is is expanding over the years.


The Nigeria Chapter

Ogieto (1987) has said that the disparity between the price and quantity of housing on the one hand, and the number of households and the money available to them to pay these prices on the other, constitutes the central problem of housing.

 Thus the unbalance in land ownership and investment is not a new phenomenon and shouldn’t be seen as such. Just as the developed nations experienced, although due to no cause of theirs, the developing nations is also expected to experience hers. The onus is on them to brace up and stand up to the challenged innovative and strategically enough to reach of a balance. Shortage of adequate housing virtually abounds in every country, particularly in the developing and third world countries (Adedeji & Olotuah 2012).

Despite this high importance placed on houses and property, it is regrettable to note that only 10% of those who desire home ownership can afford to acquire it either by way of purchase or personal construction as against 72% USA, 78% UK, 60% China, 54% Korea and 92% Singapore. Careful examining the following data, will automatically picture to one the appalling state of housing in our nation. Onibokun (1985) and Ebie (2003) stated that rent in major cities in Nigeria is about 60% of an average workers disposable income which is very much higher than the 20-30% recommendation of the United Nations. Interestingly also, the national minimum wage is N44, 000. 00 per annum. About fifty-seven percent (57%) of the Nigerian population falls below the poverty line, which is on the average of US$1 per day .This, by implication indicates that about seventy percent (70%) of Nigerians fall into this category, which also forms the nucleus of the nation’s economy. Hence is one is weigh the possibilities of a poor man owning a house in his lifetime it would be that of looking for a needle in a haystack.

Setting aside the potential for indirect investment in property by purchasing shares in property companies or investing in Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), direct investment in property will usually require a loan -65 per cent of the price-value of a property. The ability of the borrower to meet mortgage repayments will be assessed by the lender against the expected rental income stream from the property. The canons of lending in developed and emerging economies like Nigeria include;

Collateral Factor : the ratio between the loan amount and the value of the collateral-loan-to-value (LTV).

Capacity Factor: This is the borrower’s financial ability to repay his loan obligation and

Credit Factors: This refers to the borrower’s history of fulfilling his financial obligations (repaying loans, paying telephone bills paying rents etc).

By Implication any individual without a collateral factor, a good job or a faithful borrowing history is almost completely ineligible for a loan grant. Thus the requirement for a loan grant cannot be met by most people and the interest rate charged also cannot be met. One is urged to ask’ is there indeed a mortgage system in the nation? The environment of loan- getting is zero enabling and encouraging and yet the government of boast of its commitment to affordable housing.  No wonder the provision of housing in the nation is fraught with a plethora of problems especially for low-income earners who incidentally constitute the majority of the population.

One may choose to opt for other sourcing of funding in the nation which may include; government, individual savings, life insurance reserves, commercial banks, savings and loans institutions (Primary Mortgage Institutions or Building Societies) and so on. However, the most common, best-bet and traditionally that of bank loan in developing countries. The buy-to-let scenario represents perhaps the simplest arrangement of property investment, but for higher value commercial properties the situation is more complex. For commercial properties such as office blocks or shops, finance is generally raised by corporate entities, such as property companies, using existing property and other assets as collateral.

Loan or mortgage system is supposed to be a form of means by which the disequilibrium in property investment or ownership is amended, just as seen in developed countries, but the case is inverse in Nigeria. In fact loan is for rich individuals and blue chip companies. The critical role or goal of loan or mortgage which is supposed to a bridge in the disparity for those who cannot normally afford some asset (property) to be able to and overall create for some measure of equitability and empowered of its citizens has be derailed and mis- exploited. Thus, the true essence of loan and mortgage system has been misplaced. Commercial banks did not then nor do they now serve the financial needs of households (Nubi, undated). Thus the commercial banks which is supposed to be one of the poor man resort is that with the most ferocious pangs with its high and scary interest rates.  The President, Nigerian Institute of Quantity Surveyors, Agele J. AlufohaI ,on 6- 10 May 2013 said  Housing finance and mortgage system in Lagos cannot be totally ostracized from what is obtainable in Nigeria. Generally, there is no credit or finance structure available to the low income groups for land, housing and basic services in Nigeria.

Concisely,  The usually practise of the nation system of copying the developed nations systems and still poorly performing  is one which everyone is tired of laughing or frowning about. Mortgage banking development in Nigeria can be traced to the establishment of the Nigeria Building Society in 1956 which transformed, due to its high poor performance, to Federal Mortgage Bank in 1977 yet performed badly. Around 1989, PMI’s was created to serve as secondary housing finance institutions still we had no headway in our crave for solution to housing problem. The only window for all Nigerians to access financial facility for land, housing and basic services is the National Housing Fund (NHF) established in 1992 and has woefully performed.

If not for the early enough realisation, as at the 1970s by the UK and US government of the need to curb inflation, create an effective financial scheme or mortgage system geared towards equitability and empowerment of its citizens, they would as well be suffering from this housing plaque we are in Nigeria. High cost is the major reason behind non-affordability.  Finance creation to meet such is the best way out as it is more or less a strategic to handle the bull by its horn

The solution is finance creation and  accessibility. Omole (2001) highlighted the fact that financial institutions should be more accessible to the people. Thus there is a need for  innovative finance scheme, and friendly interest rates which are result- yielding by Commercial Banks, Merchant Banks, Specialised Development Banks, Insurance Companies, financial institution, Pension Fund, Corporate Bodies, Developers/Contractor Financed, Securitisation.

Just like the two quotes at the beginning of this write up, the sorry- case of property investment in Nigeria is and eye-sore but now more less a casual joke for even a professor in the nation. The nation and its leaders should realise that it is not a matter or regime difference anymore, military or democratic. Neither is the problem cornered only to unfavourable policies and land inaccessibility but the Yoke of problem is lack  finance and its accessbility and the creation of it is the way out.

. Thank you.


The change from creature to creator: The Root- cause of the Abnormalcies in Today’s World (Biblical insight)

‘’What men create will ultimately rule over them’’

The Holy Bible gave an account of the beginning of man and that how he was created after all other things or beings, living or non living, were created. It also said how man was given instruction to rule over all the creatures

God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground.”

29 Then God said, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food. 30 And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds in the sky and all the creatures that move along the ground—everything that has the breath of life in it—I give every green plant for food.” And it was so.’- Gen 1:28-29

Although it is generally preached and believe that God created man last because he is so special and that he is rule over all that He has created but there is another reason many have never reflected upon.

God created man last he has no reason to create anything but to rule and multiply. Everything created capable of fruitful and multiplying, God instructed them to do so even before man was created and when man was created, God instructed him same but added that he should rule over other creatures. God after every creation He did, he saw it was good and after his last creation, man, God again saw all that he created as good.

 ‘God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. And there was evening, and there was morning ‘- Gen 1: 31.

Noteworthy is that God didn’t create darkness.-“Let there be light,” and there was light. God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness.’’- Gen 1: 3-

16 God made two great lights—the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars. Gen 1: 16-17

 Thus, man was just as good as water, land, star, birds, livestock, the creatures that move along the ground, the wild animals and so on except that  man had the mandate to rule over them. Thus in actual fact we are more or less equal.

Perhaps man misunderstood or mis-acted on the instruction ‘rule’ by going out of the boundaries- the reason of the mishaps we see in our world today.

God created man last so that he didn’t or shouldn’t create anything else except to multiply like every other creature and also the power to rule. Thus the original intention of God for man was not to be a creator because to him should be all the Glory even the glory of creation.

However sin crept in and made an almost eternal alteration on the existing laid down principles

In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.’ Gen 3:19’

Although the original architectural design by God for man was not to be creator as has instructed everything that can multiply to do so automatically, man now had to plant, work, and sweat before he could eat- the reason and inception of man creation. More so this survival technique grew into manifolds of phenomena as man went from level to level, quest to quest through different channels just to survive.

Thus the equation had to be reversed by the coefficient of mercy through JESUS but the equation was not restored to its formal way but was a little modified. However man is yet to discover fully how to enjoy directly from the original equation and its attempt to know this  is often intractable and left with no choice but to increase his appetite for creations

Is it abnormal for creation or creature to rule over a creator? Perhaps since we now live in such world, many of us of accepted it as a normalcy.

God, as before sin, wanted man as a creature but by and after sin, man turn into creator as opposed to the original design plan of the Almighty. Now, everything man has created shall or will eventually be more curse over blessing except that which God giveth.

Man created Law and policies and these rule or should rule over man in any facet. A non-living or abstract thing ruling over a living and real thing. This is quite absurd and in fact a mysterious concept. The creator man turn into is the source of the mysteries we find all around us today.

 Industrialization, economy traumas and misinterpretations, institution, accommodation, transportation, productions, construction are ruling or will eventually rule over man.

The authentic reason behind this is that we are supposed to be creatures not creators. We took on a position which wasn’t ours neither are we capacitated for  and have been performing there like we are; we have doom ahead of us especially those not receiving the wisdom from God and are ruling over most men. Man is a good as plant, sun and so on but man has taken on joy to exploit them however good intention driven he may be or choose to.

What you are and how you are is who are and one should recognise and accept that. This concept  of change which most people have ignored or are ignorant of have kept the world on a pivot of chaos and every attempt to reach a balance is costly in different unimaginable ways. God sees everything and he permits of them. Inequalities, violence, recession, disasters of various forms all have their roof in the swap of man from a creature to a creator.

In conclusion, the supremacy of God is absolute. Jesus is the beginning of the new creation and in Him were all things created as He has he mandate to do so.

The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. 16 For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. 17 He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. 18 And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy. 19 For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, 20 and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross’ – Col 1:15-20